- #1

tony873004

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,752

- 143

[tex]\int {\cos \,3x\,\,dx\,\, = \,\,\int {\cos \,u\,\, = \,\,\sin \,u + C\,\, = \,\,\sin 3x + C} } [/tex]

But the right answer is 1/3 sin(3x). Where did the 1/3 come from?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter tony873004
- Start date

- #1

tony873004

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,752

- 143

[tex]\int {\cos \,3x\,\,dx\,\, = \,\,\int {\cos \,u\,\, = \,\,\sin \,u + C\,\, = \,\,\sin 3x + C} } [/tex]

But the right answer is 1/3 sin(3x). Where did the 1/3 come from?

- #2

- 286

- 0

[tex]\int {\cos \,3x\,\,dx\,\, = \,\,\int {\cos \,u\,\,dx???\,\, = \,\,\sin \,u + C\,\, = \,\,\sin 3x + C} } [/tex]

with respect to what variable? x?

or, did you mean to have a du in there?

If you meant for a du to be there, what makes you think that du can be substituted for dx? You wrote u=3x. if I take the derivative, with respect to x, I get du/dx = 3. Multiplying both sides by dx (thanks, Leibnitz for that notation), I get du = 3 dx. And from that, dx will be equal to 1/3 du

- #3

- 286

- 0

[tex]\int {\sec x \sec x \tan xdx [/tex]

Let u = secx

du/dx = secxtanx

du = secxtanxdx

Now, when you substitute, u will take care of the first secx.

But, du will take care of the rest of it: secxtanxdx

- #4

tony873004

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,752

- 143

I think I did it right, but I still have a question.

[tex]u = 3x,\,\,\,\,\frac{{du}}{{dx}} = \left( {3x} \right)^\prime = 3,\,\,\,\,dx = \frac{{du}}{\begin{array}{l}

3 \\

\\

\end{array}},\,\,\,\,\int {\cos \,3x\,\,dx\,\,} = \,\,\int {\cos \,u\,\,\frac{{du}}{3} = \frac{{\sin u}}{3}} = \frac{{\sin 3x}}{3}[/tex]

So when I integrate, the du simply disappears?

I hate Leibnitz notation. I do not think it is intuitive. I wish in Calc 1 they would have spent a lecture on Leibnitz notation. Rather, they just started using it without describing it.

[tex]u = 3x,\,\,\,\,\frac{{du}}{{dx}} = \left( {3x} \right)^\prime = 3,\,\,\,\,dx = \frac{{du}}{\begin{array}{l}

3 \\

\\

\end{array}},\,\,\,\,\int {\cos \,3x\,\,dx\,\,} = \,\,\int {\cos \,u\,\,\frac{{du}}{3} = \frac{{\sin u}}{3}} = \frac{{\sin 3x}}{3}[/tex]

So when I integrate, the du simply disappears?

I hate Leibnitz notation. I do not think it is intuitive. I wish in Calc 1 they would have spent a lecture on Leibnitz notation. Rather, they just started using it without describing it.

Last edited:

- #5

- 1,090

- 6

- #6

- 479

- 2

At this point you should factor out the constant, 1/3, from the integral:

[tex]\frac{1}{3} \int {\cos \,u\,\,du[/tex]

- #7

tony873004

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,752

- 143

...Kind of like: 4 + 3 = 7, we don't leave the + there.

:rofl: Thanks to you, I will never forget that.

Thanks, everyone. This was so confusing to me until I asked here. I just plowed through the next 10 problems with ease. But I'm stuck on the 11th, so I'm giving up for the night.

- #8

- 2

- 0

- #9

cristo

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 8,122

- 74

Man, that was an easy problem.

It's only easy if you know the answer! When learning, any problem can be difficult if you can't see what to do!

Share: