11 March 2016 - Forum Rules
Started by pianohombre, August 30, 2017, 08:14:14 PM
Quote from: Jorpho on August 31, 2017, 09:18:36 AMSo how is this different from Zelda Classic, aside from not actually being ready yet?
Quote from: pianohombre on September 02, 2017, 05:33:09 AMJust wondering why Zelda Classic didn't get sued and Runiya did, then it occurred to me. Oh yea Runiya is charging money and Zelda Classic is free. There you have it folks if you don't want to get sued work for free. I guess we are blessed that so many fans and hackers love working with the games and don't necessarily care so much about payment.
Quote from: pianohombre on October 06, 2017, 11:06:53 PMTriple threat? What games exactly. I only know of a few that would qualify.
QuoteThere's so many fan-made clones of Super Mario on websites, they couldn't really attempt to sue all of them.
Quote from: Jorpho on October 07, 2017, 12:31:03 PMWell, a "triple threat" would imply exactly three. AM2R, Pokemon Uranium, and No Mario's Sky, I'm guessing. Super Mario Fusion shut down (I think they were just looking for an excuse more than anything), and Mother 4 announced that they would change the name, but neither received direct legal threats, or so I understand.I think they did go after Super Mario Bros. X. Seems to me they need to strike a careful balance between being protective and calling attention to things that they hope will just get swept under the rug.
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 20 queries.