I hate to be rude, but in my honest opinion, I find this whole new policy with the ROM/ISO information to be rather annoying and pointless. Most people don't even know what any of it actually means. Wouldn't it be enough to just have a readme text file included with the patch that says "use version 1.0 or 1.1 of the ROM - headered or unheadered" or whatever?
Before I was able to finally submit my Silva Saga-II translation last year, it was rejected about two or three times because I didn't add this useless information in the ROM/ISO field. I had to ask my team mates for it just so I could get past this new field requirement for submissions.
I'm not saying that it should be removed, but could it at least be made an optional field? I firmly believe that if RHDN keeps up this new rigid enforcement of pointless rules and requirements, many fans will stop submitting hacks and translations here because they simply don't want to put up with their submissions being constantly rejected. This otherwise great site will then miss out on many possible future hack and translation submissions. Again, I don't mean to be neither rude nor pushy. This is merely a suggestion, not an order, nor anything else.
Thank you very much for your time and understanding in this manner (holds for applause)...