« on: December 18, 2019, 05:18:59 pm »
You either review the hack and what it sets out to do, or you don't. It should not be used for your personal opinion/blog postings about how you feel.
If some hack is to restore drinks of "Milk" to the original Japaneses "Beer" and the hack does what it says it does and works without issues, then that's a "YES" recommendation no question, not a "NO" I much prefer the "Milk" because I grew up on the USA version and it has always been "Milk" to me. Like that's cool n' all you like "Milk", and you can continue to do so, but then don't use the hack where the entire point of it is to restore a thing.
Now if those reviews about the blood for example were more like, "I think the blood is over the top here, the author took liberties here and there by adding too much, the blood is distracting, and covers most of the screen at times, making things harder to see and harder to play because of it". That would at least be more acceptable here because it at least addresses some potential gameplay problems that can result of added blood effects, etc.
Reviews should have at least something constructive in them about whatever is being reviewed, that should be like rule #1 for review submissions/approvals.
I guess we need approvals for the approvals now.